I remember wandering the expo at Crankworx 2020, in Rotorua, when I was called over to the Leatt booth with the promise of seeing something exciting. I was indeed excited as I checked out Leatt’s first range of MTB shoes. It wasn’t perfect, but it showed glimmers of hope that Leatt could become a legitimate player in the MTB footwear game, completing their head-to-toe ethos.

ProClip 4.0 Shoes

Fast-forward five years and I’m rolling deep in a fresh pair of Leatt ProClip 4.0 shoes to review. The 4.0 ProClip is a gravity-focused shoe that aims to protect – rather than be lightweight – without detracting from pedalling performance or power transfer.

There’s no missing the MOZ dial cable lacing system at the front and centre of the tongue. MOZ allows micro-adjust tension, with a pull to release its complete tension. The system makes for an easy-on, easy-off shoe. The dial is simple to use and has a decent rubberised outer edge, allowing it to be tensioned as tight as you’d ever need. I’ve encountered some dial styles that don’t have enough grip to grunt on them, but they work well. Over the front of the foot seems to make more sense than the all-too- common venerable dials on the side of shoes.

My only comment on the MOZ would be that it would be nice to see micro-adjust for tension release rather than the pull release that dumps all the tension in one go… but perhaps I’m being a little picky, and it’s by no means a deal breaker. A nice firm Velcro strap tensions the ankle area; there’s no stretch in the strap, so I can pull it nice and tight. I need to get it in just the right place to give perfect tension as there is no ‘give’ in the strap, meaning once it’s in place, it stays firm.

Visually, the shoe takes cues from the classic skate shoes of the 90s. The ProClip 4.0 doesn’t strike a slim silhouette; they’re a protective item, so we wouldn’t want a shoe that’s too slim. There’s no excess padding to absorb water; once wet, they dry pretty quickly compared to some. The outer is a mid-cut with a higher neoprene cuff to keep the loam and niggly pebbles from entering the shoe. It works great and has the nice touch of being slightly perforated to help with breathability. Heel and toe reinforcements offer some peace of mind that your tootsies should come out unscathed after those sketchy moments when you’re dabbing feet, or clipping a sniper root with your toes.

The gum sole is oh-so-hot right now. It features a familiar waffle pattern throughout most of its length, with strategically placed lugs under the toes and heel for walking grip. Thanks to the RideGrip rubber compound, the platform is surprisingly stable when not clipped in, assisted by a shallow concave section under the arch. A soft EVA midsole makes them comfy on foot while walking or hiking. The EVA does a noticeable job of absorbing chatter and vibrations, helping to reduce fatigue in the feet and lower legs. Traction for walking is reasonable in the dry, and the rubber is tacky enough to offer confidence, although scrambling around in the mud is as slippery as you’d expect; these are riding shoes, not hiking or “all-mountain” shoes. Pedalling stiffness is similar to the pair of Shimano GE-700s I recently reviewed, with a good medium flex for efficient pedalling and comfort for standing in lift queues or hiking jump lines. The 4.0 ProClip could take the win for having the most extended cleat channels in any shoe I’ve seen – there’s a serious amount of fore and aft adjustment, allowing for an almost mid-foot through to under-the-toe cleat mounting if you so desire. Gravity riders rejoice.

Size wise, I found these run on the larger size compared to most, so you may be able to downsize. As with almost all footwear: try before you buy.

Overall, the ProClip 4.0 is plenty comfortable and offers great protection for all eventualities. I like the mega cleat channels; it’s the first shoe I haven’t had to slam my cleat right back on. They aren’t the lightest or stiffest shoes out there but, if you’re more suited to cutting downhill laps, riding shuttles or just goofing off on the bike rather than pedalling significant distances, you can’t go wrong with these.

Velocity 4.0 MTB X-Flow Iriz Goggle

Ask anyone who’s gone over the bars and landed on their face if they think goggles are an essential part of their protective kit, and I’m confident you’ll get a resounding “yes”. Speaking from experience and a nice scar down my cheek, I’d agree. On a hot January day, while practising for a downhill race at Cardrona, in the early 2000s, I stopped on a corner to remove my goggles as they were saturated in sweat and stifling my face. As I rolled back onto the track my front wheel caught a rock, and I was pitched headfirst down a bank. A rock shot the gap in my full-face and got me just beneath my right eye, splitting my face open like a tomato. Fortunately, I sustained no lasting effects other than a scar, but the doctors determined the cut was millimetres from causing severe damage to my eye. The funny thing is, had I been wearing the Velocity 4.0 X-Flow goggles, I’d probably not have overheated and would have kept the goggles on rather than hanging them off my handlebars, and likely walked away from the crash with just a bruised ego and scratched goggles. Goggles or glasses? I’m not entirely sure what to call these. They have advantages similar to glasses but with the extra cushion and a more secure fit. They also have the protection and field of view of goggles, which is, to some degree, the best of both worlds. Mountain bike riders generally don’t see the same speeds as motocross riders, and there’s seldom debris or dust flung from a rider in front, so in the form of the 4.0 X-Flow, the traditional moto goggle has been tweaked to suit mountain biker’s needs.

The use case for wearing goggles has become much broader with the advent of the Velocity X-Flow series from Leatt, which has ruled out – or at least minimised – the downsides of wearing regular goggles. The minor trade-off of having open areas in the frame is that debris could make it into the goggle cavity. I haven’t experienced this, but I imagine it could happen, particularly in the wet, when worn with an open-face helmet.

The fit is similar to that of a good pair of goggles, with a twist. Leatt designers strategically removed sections of the foam padding, allowing for a vast amount of breathability from the top and bottom of the frame. They also nailed the look by keeping them looking like a pair of goggles, rather than the more polarising hybrid goggles/glasses style of some competitors.

The Rideviz lens features permanent anti-fog and scratch-resistant coatings and meets the ‘Military Ballistic Impact Standard (MIL-DTL- 43511D)’ – so the rock that pierced my face wouldn’t stand a chance against this lens! The Iriz tint strikes the sweet spot between being too dark and too light; I find it spot on for almost all conditions, taking the harshness out of the light on open trails but not dark enough to dull the scene too much when in the bush.

My first outing with these on my face was a jaunt aboard an eBike on a muggy, blue sky spring day, not the usual conditions for me to reach for a pair of goggles. The increased airflow over a regular goggle was immediately noticeable. My face didn’t feel sealed in a hot box, and air flowed between the lens and my face, controlling the temperature. The field of view is mega and no different to a quality set of goggles.

The top foam absorbs sweat, which is excellent until it becomes saturated; at that point, I occasionally experience a drip of sweat down the inside of the lens. On a stinking hot day, the X-Flows are still warmer than sunglasses, but not by much. Since the lens sits further from the face than on glasses, they collect less sweat on the lens, and there’s a significant increase in protection, too. The mesh strap is a nice touch, theoretically allowing some breeze to pass through into the helmet vents—a hard one to quantify, but I see no reason it wouldn’t be the case.

I’ve become a fan of these goggles. I appreciate that they resemble traditional goggles, and Leatt has nailed it regarding breathability. I now wear them in situations or rides where I wouldn’t have even considered it with regular goggles—thumbs up.

Glove MTB 2.0 X-Flow Stealth

Is it me, or have gloves become a consumable, throwaway item? Back in the early 2000s, a pair of gloves would literally last me seasons, and my riding volume was probably twice what it is now. Since then, quality gloves seem more and more difficult to find, particularly if you’re chasing something lightweight and breathable that will last more than a summer. The stitching, particularly on the fingers, is usually the first to go, and there are only so many times I want to restitch and bodge them to be usable. I didn’t get too excited when the Leatt 2.0 X-Flow gloves arrived for review last year.

I’m pretty finicky about what gloves I’m comfortable in. A minimal palm is key, and I find the fabric tension across the back of my hand needs to be just right—not too tight to restrict movement, but with enough support to keep them snug and avoid bunching. More importantly, they must help keep the palm taut and in place. See what I mean? Finicky.

With a stretch fit and slip-on design, these take a little technique and patience to put on, but once on, the medium size fits my medium-sized hands perfectly; snug throughout with no firm points or obvious pressure points. Fingers are explicitly tailored to minimise bunching when wrapped around a handlebar, and are stitched with a specific thread to aid longevity. The main body fabric is a Leatt X-Flow material, a 4-way stretch mesh that helps with breathability and fit. Knuckles and pinky fingers get an extra layer of thin rubber material for added protection and reinforcement, adding negligible weight or bulk. The backs of the thumbs have a terry cloth wipe.

The palm is made from a single piece of Leatt’s NanoGrip material. It’s nice and thin and has a slightly furry, almost cat-paw-like surface, which gives superior grip in all conditions. The handlebar feel is exceptional, possibly the best of any gloves I’ve worn. Some wizardry in the fabric means the fingers are touchscreen compatible, which is a bonus whether you’re filming ‘shreddits’ with your mates or calling for help after a crash.

After about four months of wearing these gloves, I’m pretty impressed, and they’ve become my go- to. The X-Flow fabric has kept its shape and firm stretch, and all seams are still intact. Although the palm has some stains, it is holding up well with no signs of wear. A resounding clap for Leatt for continuing to make gear that works well and lasts the distance. There is no fast fashion here.