Revel Rascal
Words Justin Henehan
Images Mikhail Huggins
RRP $12,288
Distributor Revel Bikes
A spring in its step, the Revel Rascal is a rewarding ride for trail dissectors.
Revel Bikes has not been a strong presence in New Zealand… until now.
Since its 2019 inception, the company has been through a redemption arc plotted by owner Adam Miller’s sale of the brand to a private equity firm in 2021, its April 2025 shutdown, and then Miller buying back the business a month later.
Since then, Miller sought to take the brand back to its roots, making Revel leaner, more sustainable and more rider focused. He moved the company from the fittingly named Carbondale, in Colorado, to the aspirational-sounding Golden, also in Colorado, so it could be nearer main centres and the brand’s network of suppliers and customers.
Despite its short and turbulent history, Revel has built a strong following in America with a core range of bikes built around the Canfield Balanced Formula suspension system. Now, Miller is pushing the brand beyond the States, into Aotearoa, offering direct shipping to New Zealand. While you may not have seen many Revels on the trails here yet, you should expect to soon.

Details
With 130mm travel out back, and 150mm up front, the Rascal is Revel’s out-and-out trail-bike. Like all Revels, the Rascal uses the Canfield Balanced Formula suspension platform, which drives the damper via two co-rotating links. Revel also adds a clevis link to the mix, presumably to help isolate the rear shock from torsional loads and tune the leverage ratio.
There’s nothing fussy or unnecessary about the Rascal, it’s a clean, lean riding machine. The frame is carbon through-and-through, from its front and rear triangles to its shapely linkages. Sporting two water bottle mounts, the Rascal has a threaded bottom bracket, internally guided cables, SRAM UDH, a dropset-style headset, but no internal storage compartment, no headset routing, and no geometry adjustments. The cable routing is tidy and simple, although the rear-brake line is a little exposed to damage where it exits the front triangle below the bottom bracket and disappears into the chainstays.
Revel’s commitment to the CBF suspension platform is admirable in an era when all bikes seem to be converging on the Horst-link layout. But, like all designs, CBF has its strengths and weaknesses, depending on your preferences.
Anti-squat and anti-rise levels on the Rascal are at the higher end of the spectrum. Anti-squat at sag sits at 120 per cent, falling to around 90 per cent at full travel. This should create a slight extension of the suspension under power and a very firm feel at the pedals. Anti-rise is about 100 per cent at sag falling to 90 per cent at full travel, which will make the suspension squat slightly under braking, preserving the geometry well, particularly on steeper sections of trail. At 21 per cent, the Rascal is moderately progressive and will work well with air shocks and coil shocks with hydraulic-bottom-out control.
The Rascal’s geometry is fairly standard for a trail bike, with a 65-degree head-tube angle (150mm fork), 76-degree seat tube, and reach numbers ranging from 431mm for size small through to 528mm on the XXL. The only outlier is chainstay length, which is 436mm across all sizes – taller riders take note.
The parts Revel chose for the Rascal are what you’d expect for a bike in this class, with a RockShox Lyrik Ultimate fork and Super Deluxe shock across all builds. The main price point differentiator is groupsets, with the most expensive build getting SRAM XX Transmission and the cheapest receiving the cable-actuated Eagle 90 Transmission. The only unusual part of the build is the tyres – the classic enduro/ all-mountain combo of a Maxxis DHF and DHR in EXO+ and Double Down is a heavy-hitting and slow rolling choice for a trail bike. I’d rather have a slightly faster option like the new Maxxis Dissector for a bike like the Rascal.
Climbing
I decided not to look at any information at all before my first ride on the Rascal: no reviews, no marketing, no graphs. I wanted a purely vibes-based first impression.
The first thing I noticed? This bike pedals well … really, really well. The Rascal is exceptionally good at transmitting power into the contact patch. Even with the draggy enduro-bike tyres, it surges along with minimal effort.
Looking down at the shock, there’s very little energy lost to the suspension system when pedalling. Not only is the climb switch redundant on this bike, I’d go as far as to say it detracts from the climbing experience by robbing the bike of grip. On the Rascal, the juice of a locked-out shock just isn’t worth the squeeze.
The track I used for testing had a number of tricky root sections – some stepped, some angled, some arrayed in Jackson Pollock-like scatters. On sections like these, the Rascal climbs best when attacking – pick your line, put the power down, and the Rascal will caper up with a spring in its step.
Squinting at the numbers shows why the Rascal climbs with so much energy — anti-squat starts at a whopping 140 per cent, dropping to about 120 per cent at sag, only falling below 100 per cent past the 100mm-travel mark.
As a result, you can feel the tyre pushing into the dirt with each pedal stroke on the Rascal. With that comes a more than ordinary amount of pedal kickback, but not so much that I couldn’t manage balance and traction. In certain situations, the anti-squat felt like it was generating grip as the linkage extended slightly to drive the contact patch into the ground.
Climbing technical trails on this bike requires a slightly different technique, one that favours a more attacking style. It’s a very different feel to the Forbidden Druid V2, which combines a rearward axle path and very low pedal kickback. Where the Druid likes to crawl up and over obstacles, the Rascal prefers you to use power, momentum and precision. It’s a bike that clearly tells you what the wheel is doing, allowing you to coax the rear wheel through technical terrain.

Conclusion
Where bikes such as the Forbidden Druid V2 and Norco Fluid feel like little bikes with big- bike energy, the Revel Rascal knows exactly what it does well: it’ll get you to the trailhead fast, tell you what’s happening at the wheels, and reward you for riding well. It’ll go fast when the trail is smooth and is incredibly engaging on technical trails where speeds are lower. It’s a bike that demands full focus, an analytical approach, and an active riding style.
The Rascal feels like it could suit two different ends of the trail-bike spectrum. At one end, the rider who wants a light bike that pedals extremely well could swap out the tyres for something faster rolling and add some svelte suspension. At the other, a burlier fork and a higher volume shock would push it more into the light-enduro category. As it stands, the Rascal is a great all rounder that sits more at the light and efficient end of the trail bike curve.
It’s a bike for big days on the pedals, attacking technical climbs, and puzzle-solving at speed on the descents. The Rascal is a high-energy, high-engagement, high-functioning machine that gives back what you put in to deliver an incredibly rewarding experience.
Pros
Incredible pedaler
Engaging to ride
Rewards an active and analytical riding style
Cons
Chainstays may feel short to taller riders
Tight tyre clearance
Brake cable routing exposed to damage

Giro Chamber Trail Shoes
Words Liam Friary
Images Callum Wood
RRP $399
Distributor Worralls
The Chamber has a pedigree on the World Cup circuit, with Giro’s full DH Chamber taking some wins at the top level. Giro’s intention is to take the DH Chamber lineage of maximum power transfer and durability and applying it to the Chamber Trail. The aim is not to have a lesser version of the DH Chamber but one that still makes it a suitable sibling.
The foundation is a tri-molded sole built to the same specification as the Chamber DH. Trimolded construction uses three distinct layers, in this case a rubber outsole, an IMEVA midsole and a TPU plate, each contributing a specific property to the overall package. The rubber outsole is Giro’s proprietary Sensor compound, developed to balance grip on wet roots, rocks and mud. They’re durable enough for a full day of walking sections you weren’t quite ready for. The TPU plate adds torsional stiffness through the midsole, which is where power transfer happens, or doesn’t. A shoe that flexes through the sole when you’re hammering out of a corner is giving away watts and precision you didn’t mean nor want to give. The +10mm cleat setback moves the cleat toward the heel relative to the ball of the foot, which reduces hot spots on long rides and improves walking characteristics off the bike.
Where the Chamber Trail departs from its DH sibling is in the upper. A microfibre construction with integrated mesh ventilation replaces the heavier material of the full Chamber, dropping weight and improving breathability without compromising the structural integrity of the fit. The closed-knit ankle cuff is a specific and useful detail, it keeps trail debris out of the shoe on the kind of terrain where small rocks and loose material have a way of finding every gap. The BOA Li2 dial is the premium end of BOA’s closure system. Machined aluminium construction, a wider turning range than standard dials, and lace guides injection-moulded directly into the shoe rather than bonded on top. This means a more precise and even distribution of closure pressure across the foot.
Pulling on the shoes for the first time felt kind of awkward. The closed-knit ankle cuff is a little strange for the first few times when you get them. Sometimes rolling back on itself but after more uses, the material getting looser putting them on becomes more natural. Once locked in with a few clicks of the BOA they felt secure. On the trails they took a bit to loosen up as it would me with most new shoes. After that they held me securely, avoided trail debris from getting in my shoe and on-the-fly adjustments were dead simple on the side of the trail or on the uplift. They felt firm and planted which delivered better power transfer. As for fitting whilst they did distribute firmness around the foot via the BOA dial I think another BOA dial would make them more secure and allow for greater adjustment throughout the entire foot. Whilst most conditions weren’t roasting hot they did breath well via the mesh ventilation which I was thankful for with several all-day rides back to back.
DH-platform trail shoes often have a stiffness that makes them exceptional for descending but a potential liability on the climbs. Where Giro has gone with the Chamber Trail is that the platform is trail-tuned rather than DH-tuned, which implies a degree of calibration in the midsole flex rather than a straight transplant. I did find even on longer pedalling sections they were stiff enough to deliver instant power to the cranks but still had a degree of flex about them. I do sometimes suffer from hot spots on my feet and did have them a few times with these shoes however it was after 20min plus descents. I also had the cleat a little forward similar to my older pair of shoes so after some adjustment it relived the hot spots. The cleat setback at +10mm kicks in here, moving the pedal contact point further toward the heel reduces stiff soles feel punishing on long rides and improve stability over rough terrain.
Giro’s Sensor rubber compound is a proprietary formulation designed to work across various trail shoe surfaces, rather than optimising for a single condition. Wet roots are the real test, as most trail shoe rubber either grips in wet conditions or wears well in dry ones. Finding a compound that does both without compromising either is challenging, which is why most shoes make a choice and accept the trade-off. The combination of the closed ankle cuff, the BOA fit system and the IMEVA midsole hold the fit and comfort of the shoe through a long day, rather than loosening up as the upper breaks in and the closure system settles. The mesh ventilation is another variable on all-day comfort, as trail riding generates enough heat through the foot that a shoe with poor airflow becomes uncomfortable by afternoon, particularly in warmer conditions. The integrated mesh approach keeps the upper clean and structural while allowing airflow at the specific points where heat tends to build.
A shoe that performs brilliantly for the first two hours and quietly destroys your feet by hour five isn’t a solid trail shoe. It’s a marketing shoe that looks good in pictures on the internet. The Chamber Trail sits at the serious end of the trail shoe market without quite reaching the top. For that money you’re getting a DH platform that Giro has proven at World Cup level, a BOA Li2 and a Sensor rubber compound developed specifically for the trail shoe context. The case against is that a DH-derived platform is making a specific promise about stiffness and power transfer that may not suit every rider’s pedalling preference. Those who prioritise comfort on long climbs over descending precision may find the trade-off skews the wrong way. But for riders who spend more time pointing the bike downhill than up, or who ride technical terrain where the DH credentials of the platform actually matter, the Chamber Trail makes a strong and rather compelling argument for itself. After the last two months in the shoe they’ve done the job bloody well across varied terrain in both islands. The solid platform drives more confidence descending. BOA’s are super simple at the trail head and on-the-fly. Of course time will tell about how they wear but after quite a hard life to date they’re stacking up well.









